Thursday, July 12, 2012

Positive Psychology Theory: A Way to Understanding Literature and the Creative Process







Positive Psychology Theory:
A Way to Understanding Literature and the Creative Process
Emily Bencsics
Indiana University South Bend
ENG-L 680 Psychology and Literature
Professor Joe Chaney
July 12, 2012











Positive Psychology Theory:  A Way to Understanding Literature and the Creative Process
           
            While most branches of psychology focus on specific mental ailments of the patient such as depression, anger management issues, and a whole host of other neuroses; it is the emphasis on self-potential and fulfillment that sets the positive psychology theory apart from all of the others.  Born from the Humanistic approach in the 1950s, positive psychology has emerged as being one of the only modern day theories that center on a person’s internal happiness, rather than a person’s dysfunction or abnormal behavior.  Focusing on holistic health, positive psychology has been described as a way “to build thriving individuals, families, and communities” (Cherry, 2012, para. 2).  Mainly, positive psychology concerns itself with the optimistic aspects of one’s life. 
            Developed in the 1990s, positive psychology was originally thought to deal with three main issues:  “First …well-being, flow, joy, optimism, and hope.  Second …studying personality traits of thriving individuals…focusing on character strengths and virtues…Finally, identifying, studying, and enhancing those qualities of social institutions that sustain and enhance positive subjective experiences…” (Robbins, 2008, p. 96).  Upon first examination, it may be easy to assume that positive psychology ignores the very tangible psycho-social issues afflicting people today.  However, this assumption is far from accurate.  Positive psychology primes people to search for their own inner strengths, and gets one away from a “woe is me – everything is wrong” attitude. Refreshing in its assurance, positive psychology may very well offer more than an optimistic outlook; it may very well reveal insights into one’s creative process as well. 
            For many writers, accessing the chaotic, dramatic, and downright disturbing parts of the mind is, well, relatively easy and/or common.  Positive psychology suggests that retrieving the optimistic, altruistic, and spiritualistic aspects of one’s psyche is not only of equal importance, but could actually result in a more satisfying outcome for the artist/writer.  In other words, the writer who recognizes some of the base positive emotions that come out of the act of writing should exhibit a more confident and fulfilled nature; therefore, the act of writing in itself propels the author to produce thereby continuing a contented cycle of rewarding behavior. 
            In addition to understanding the positive emotions linked to the creative process, there is one in particular that deserves attention and is a focal point in positive psychology – mindfulness.  According to Dean Robbins (2008), a “fully functioning person [has] qualities such as being nondefensive and open to experience; fully living in the moment…recognizing his or her freedom…being creative, reliable, and constructive…”(p.98).  Without sounding like a Buddhist-based self-help book, being mindful is paramount to the writer’s creative process.  Generally, writers are extremely purposeful in their creations, and the literature to come from such authors expresses attention to detail, the overwhelming need to share, and a spirituality that speaks to doing something bigger than oneself.  Obviously, there are exceptions to the rule as many a writer has produced less than mediocre effort because the mind wasn’t fully present in the work.  Perhaps this is one of those pieces, but then again, perhaps this author is hopeful. 
References
Cherry, K. (n.d.). What is positive psychology? Retrieved from http://psychology.about.com/od/branchesofpsycholog1/a/positive-psychology.htm
Robbins, D. (2008).  What is the good life? Positive psychology and the renaissance of Humanistic psychology.  Humanistic Psychologist, 36(2), 96-112.
            doi: 10.1080/08873260802110988